Lenses for portraiture – Canon vs Leica

Sophie kindly agreed to model for me in this casual test of three portrait lenses (plus an odd fourth choice but certainly worthwhile – The Canon 300mm f2.8L)

These images were taken late one evening about one hour from sunset (in the UK) in a heavily wooded area to get subdued lighting with some background character – The ISO setting ranged from 800 to 1600 on the Canon 5D Mk2 and ISO 800 on the Leica M9 – this was to ensure a fast enough shutter speed in the low light
Careful positioning of Sophie to make use of the interesting light was essential and a monopod for the 300mm Canon lens was also essential
Aperture priority throughout using close to maximum aperture on all lenses – you can see the technical detail by right clicking on the image and choose image properties (apart from the Tele-Elmarit which was at f2.8 and f 3.2 throughout)
Processed in Lightroom and tweaked for levels and colour temperature on the RAW files – cropped where needed for composition

First the Canon 85mm f1.8 – a fantastic compact portrait lens which performs at its best slightly stopped down

Next up is the Canon 135mm F2.0L – again a fantastic lens – a little long for portraits but extremely sharp – great Bokeh and can be used wide open with ease
I stopped down a little as the depth of field is a little extreme at f2

Next we have the Tele-Elmarit 90mm f2.8 on the Leica M9 – a very old lens (1970′s) but with great characteristics for portraiture – a little difficult to get the focus spot on but perseverance and multi shots normally mean one of the series will be spot on

And finally the sports lens – Canon 300mm f2.8L – Large and heavy – extremely sharp if you can nail the focus – wonderful Bokeh at this focal length – not recommended for daily use but incredible results

This entry was posted in Canon 135mm f2, Canon 300mm f2.8L, Canon 5D Mk2, Canon 85mm f1.8, Leica M9, Outdoor Portraiture, Tele Elmarit 90mm f2.8 and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>